Darren Rowse doesn't check his work and I can prove it. Even though I just said that, don't let it stop you from reading ProBlogger. Most of his articles are worth reading at least once.

As I was perusing 31 Days to Building a Better Blog, I spotted some errors that even a beginning blogger should have caught. I didn't even have to look very hard. Here's what I found:

  • Find "2 Seconds to Convince" under "Days 6-8". You'll find it again under "Days 9-13".
  • Find "Pillars support your blog success." under "Days 9-13". You'll find it again under "Days 14-19".
  • Find "Adsense Optimisation, Straight from the Horse's Mouth". You'll find it two times in a row under "Days 9-13". The first one links to a WordPress edit page on the writer's blog. The second one has the correct link.

There may be more errors, but I think I made my point. I have to say that I'm a bit disappointed. Darren should have spotted these errors as he compiled the page. I'm hoping he'll fix these errors when he finishes adding in the last batch of links for his group writing project.

I'm also disappointed that Darren accepted every link that was submitted without checking each one first. Was every article submitted link-worthy? I seriously doubt it. I was excited when he included mine. That excitement waned as I noticed how many links from the same bloggers were appearing in each batch.

Regardless, as soon as the last batch is published and as soon as I can compile it, I'll publish the complete list of links (sans my own, the duplicates, and the ones with errors) by blog in an article of my own. It'll be my way of showing appreciation for the effort that went into the project.

(Update: Darren responded in the comments. Perhaps I should take a nap before I write things like this. If I had waited, I probably wouldn't have sounded so nasty.)