Are you a member of PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) or a member of PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals)?

One of the latest advertising campaigns from PETA, Fishing Hurts, gives a variety of reasons why humans shouldn't eat fish. In my opinion, it's a cover for their real agenda, pushing various forms of vegetarianism.

Let's examine one of the words from the title of their organization, ethical, and how it applies to the treatment of animals. According to one dictionary source, ethical means "pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct." This tells me that we're talking about the treatment of animals in a way that is not wrong in conduct. Torturing animals, starving them, not giving them shelter when needed, and things like that would be examples of wrongful conduct. I don't see anything in that definition as far as eating animals goes.

As a God-fearing person (regardless of the fact that I'm not religious), I believe that animals were put here to serve mankind, not the other way around. I will eat their flesh and I will use their skins as necessary.

I tend to look at things realistically and not through rose-colored glasses. If I listened to every extremist about what I should or shouldn't eat, I would be relegated to eating mangoes, bananas, and Bermuda grass. I mean, a portion of the animals are considered unclean according to the Old Testament, another portion are considered unhealthy by doctors, another portion are protected as endangered species, and now PETA wants me to ignore the rest?

I'm sorry, but I belong to the second PETA:

Beef, it's what's for dinner.

Pork, the other white meat.

I don't want tuna with good taste. I want tuna that tastes good.

The incredible, edible egg.

Baby, the other, other white meat. (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)